virologybusters *website under construction*

end virology

"If a lie is only printed often enough, it becomes a quasi-truth, and if such a truth is repeated often enough, it becomes an article of belief, a dogma, and men will die for it." Isabella Blagden

Many people have formed a belief in virology and the germ hypothesis; This is not based on scientific evidence or on logical reasoning, so pointing out the lack of scientific evidence and logical fallacies in virology will seldom impact the opinions held by the believers.

 

To destroy virology it is imperative to dismantle the dogma. In this section we aim  to show you how.

 

Dogma - why people hold irrational beliefs

The ABC of destroying belief in germ theory

How to give your friends the confidence to think clearly and act independently, in relation to health and disease

Dogma - why people hold irrational beliefs

Beliefs provide a framework of understanding. They help us make decisions and judgements without having to analyse every aspect of the information that enters our brain, giving us time for the important things in life, like watching American Gladiators. However, using beliefs as shortcuts means we can be manipulated by feckless individuals to accept inaccurate information

The Anatomy of Belief

 

1 - We observe an event or phenomenon, for example, people get ill

 

2 - we are presented with an explanation for that phenomenon (contagious viruses). We usually stick with the first explanation or one given by someone we trust (parents, teachers, scientists)

 

3 - Patterns. We have a "tendency to find meaningful patterns" even in random events, and "the tendency to infuse patterns with intention and agency"(Shermer, The Believing Brain).  Example - illness is caused by an agent (virus) with an intention (to invade our cells and reproduce) 

 

4 - Confirmation Bias. We actively seek evidence which supports our belief, and interpret events in a way which confirms our opinions.

 

"I caught it on the bus when someone sneezed, when I got home my mum caught it off me, then my sister caught it off her," A meaningful pattern found in random events used to support a belief in an intentional agent.

 

 

Influences on our beliefs and behaviour

In this classic experiment, Asch showed the power of the group to influence our perception and behaviour. We will believe something is true if the majority agrees. Some people disagree with the group, but behave as if they agree to avoid ridicule or rejection. 

 

"One man who stopped lying could bring down a tyranny" Alexander Solzhenitsyn

 

The positive finding in this study is that just one person expressing disagreement can give courage to others to think and act independently

This famous experiment by Milgram shows that people identify with a good cause which an authority figure provides for them, and will behave in ways contrary to moral human values, in order to contribute to the cause. (The cause Milgram provided was to advance the science of memory) People endorsed and enforced lockdowns and jabs because they believed in the goal of saving lives and wanted to contribute, even if it meant removal of freedom and injection with untested...... who knows what'?.  You're a good person if you believe in viruses because you're stopping the spread and saving your Nan, saving everyone's Nan.

 

 

Self-serving Bias

Many people have entrusted their health to the medical industry. Naturally, they want to think that the people who are keeping them alive know what they are doing. So they will readily accept the most dubious of evidence which supports medical sciences claims, while rejecting even solid evidence of medical ineptitude and pseudoscientific shenaniganry. 

 

To accept that the medical industry is incompetent or corrupt comes at too great a cost for those who have put their lives in it's hands 

Let's bring this together

Viruses, and the germ hypothesis, are a belief; a framework people use to explain the phenomenon of illness. It is a popular and strong belief due to the following,

  • The first explanation people hear, and  presented trusted authority figures.
  • A single causative agent with an intention (a pathogen which want to invade your body).
  • Patterns which appear to support it are easy to find.
  • The majority hold this belief,
  • Linked to a cause for the common good.
  • The cognitive cost of doubting the medical system is huge
  • And.......... "I saw it on the news"

It's worth watching this excellent video from Academy of Ideas. For more of their videos about compliance, authoritarianism and freedom visit the Be Happy page 

The ABC of destroying belief in germ theory

Drawing on our experience as teachers and activists, and applying the tools and techniques of MK Ultra, we present an approach to changing someone's opinion. Try this in-person, in writing, and on social media. We have used real examples of interactions, but will use the name Jack, for anonymity

Agree     Build     Crush

Agree 

Never tell anyone they are wrong; confronting beliefs head on usually serves to reinforce them. Agree with something your germ theorist says, or ask questions until you can find something to agree with

 

Here is an exchange from a telegram channel, 

 

Germ theorist "Of course there are viruses"

 Virologybuster "How do you know that?"

GT "There are thousands of electron microscope images on the internet"

VB " You're right, and it's good that you have used the internet to find scientific papers and understand electron microscopy, a lot of people don't have that level of scientific knowledge"

Build Confidence

You cannot force someone to change their mind, they have to make that decision themselves. Your job is to get them to a point where they can make the decision to reject the belief, remembering percieve that there is a high cost if they get it wrong.

On one front build their confidence in  detheir decision making and thought processes. 

 

This comment is taken from an email from a presenter from our favourite alternative news programme


"You will never resolve this debate, it goes back to Pasteur and Bechamp, the germ v terrain debate was not concluded then and it's a waste of time bringing it up now, I focus my energy on exposing vaccine harms and wider corruption, debating the existence of viruses is a distraction" 

 

 To build his confidence, reply with, " I can see you have done your reading and have a sound knowledge of the history of medicine. It's a good idea to focus your energy on the elements of the control matrix which you can make a difference in, I fully support you in your fight to expose vaccine harms" 
 

 

"Authoritarianism in ............. science ........... is becoming increasingly accepted, not particularly because so many people explicitly believe in it but because they feel themselves individually powerless and anxious." Rollo May

On another front, build their confidence that rejecting their belief in a scientific dogma will not result in catastrophe. To accept that virology/germ theory is wrong is to accept that the institutions to which they have entrusted their health and view of science may not be able to help them. This could make them anxious. You have to help cultivate a sense of independence, you can start by assuring people that,

  • There are many people who have rejected germ theory ....... and they are thriving!
  • They has the intelligence and ability to take control of their own health
  • Their family and friends will respect them despite not sharing their views

For hints on how to build this confidence click on the links below to other sections of virologybusters......

Be Happy 

Make Friends

Resources

Crush Trust in people and organisations


Belief in viruses is not based on scientific evidence but on trust in the people and organisations who pedal the dogma, so to destroy this belief, encourage people to question the validity of this trust. This must be their own process, they must come to the realisation for themselves that the virus house of cards is built by miscreants. Our job is to provide information in a passive, non-confrontational way. You can start the conversation somewhere else and see if you can find something that people find suspicious or immoral. 

 

 “Did you see that Bill Gates now owns more farm land than anyone else in America?” 
If the response is “Yes, isn’t he great, I love his woolly jumpers” agree that woollen jumpers are amazing, and MOVE ON to something else. 


But if it’s “I don’t trust him, shifty eyes, and I heard he eats babies” then you can carefully draw attention to his influence of the WHO and to the profit Gates makes from vaccine sales. 


Check the resources section for information which undermines key historical and current figures in virology and the germ hypothesis. 
 

 

Ask Questions 

 

It is often better to ask questions than give facts or instructions. Ask people how they feel about concepts, what their opinion is. Combine this with attempts to erode trust in scientific charlatans, and ask "What do you think about the profits made by pharmaceutical companies in recent years?" "do you agree the methods used by Pasteur in his studies?" (Oh, you didn't know he injected dog brain fluid into monkeys brains?) 

Name of company

Please enter your company name

 

Registered office

Please enter your registered office

 

Contact details

Please enter your contact details

 

Business ID no.

Please enter your business ID no.

 

VAT no.

Please enter your VAT no.

 

Regulatory authority

Please enter you regulatory authority

©Copyright. All rights reserved.

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.